引文:
4/3自己一個卡好.

引文:

我覺得以後4/3的forum要怎麼分也很有趣
要照廠牌呢 還是4/3自己一國

引文:
以後4/3會有
Leica body+ZD lens或
E body+Leica lens的異種組合...不管哪一種都很有趣

引文:

屆時討論區就會有 po 文 "Leica 果真在走向墮落？"

純屬開玩笑,請不罵我

引文:
问的好啊。

135傳統底片的始祖Leica假如真的支持4/3系統，
不知135全片幅DSLR信徒會作何感想

4-3 system 網頁上說 "Size of a Leica CL and it will use SD cards",
意思是說這台機器的大小跟 Leica CL 的大小相似嗎,小弟在 E330
發表的時候就覺得 4/3 system 數位單眼做成傳統SLR大小是很有
吸引力的,希望早日看到這台機器發表

引文:
http://www.4-3system.com/
http://www.leica-camera.com/discus_e/messages/3/194277.html?1138983388

"digilux3"??
Panasonic或Olympus機身為基礎的Leica 4/3 DSLR會在PMA發表??

引文:

7D還好,可以用手把

看CNET這消息panasonic 2/26會發表4/3 DSLR
http://reviews.cnet.com/4531-10921_7-6424495.html

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=17023469
Leica 4/3 body and 3 lens at Photokina?
猜測是panasonic body rebadged的...

原來如此，感謝兩位的回應

不過電池要統一似乎也不是個簡單的事...

引文:

他是說2/26為止前，Panasonic 的4/3 DSLR應該會發表。
他猜用SD及CF的雙插槽可能性是60%，SD單插槽可能性是40%。
但絕對不會是xD。
另外他最祈望的是電池和Olympus的BLM-1(7.2v1500mAh）統一規格，
不要拿Z-30用的DMW-BMA7(7.2v710mAh)或、 LC-1用的DMW-BL14(7.2v1400mAh)來兼用(雖然這個可能性很大)，
不然很麻煩。

最後它是希望各廠電池能夠統一規格，
(這個小弟2年前也提過 關於鋰電池的個人想法 )

例如KM D7D,D5D用的鋰電池，以後大概不好買了

引文:

線上翻譯:

Problem of battery (06.1/31)
　To February 26th the Panasonic make иルみДみИ machine probably becomes announcement, but that media certainly probably is the SD memory card. With SD plus CF probability 60% of dual slot. It probably is something about of probability 40% of the SD one slot. By mistake there is no xD slot. "It goes with SD", the president of the Matsushita Electric Co. "as for the product of our corporation as for all media it goes with SD", that being to have declared from the time before, it probably is about you do not make a mistake. If you say that it keeps breaking down from other companies, as a sub machine it probably is the dual slot if the intention and, of persisting in the lightweight compact, surrounding the user of Lumix firmly it probably is single. Already, it moves this from that time when it unites with Olympus and the way it is not. But now already it is completely hand lag, but if more you shouted loudly here and there, those where you think that it was good, are problem of the battery. With special care the mount being the same, being able to share the lens, it is completely troublesome for the extra battery to be different. Being black in the same way, it meaning that also shape has been similar, all the more is. The former иルみДみИ machine to be everything E-System, BLM-1 (7.2v1500mAh) So it was standardized. However in the Panasonic one, DMW-BMA7 for FZ-30 (7.2v710mAh) And, DMW-BL14 for LC-1 (7.2v1400mAh) It is. The possibility these that way becoming combined use probably will be high.
　The や - the や, it is troublesome. The fact that 2 types it carries the battery charger well is. Whether CR123A will make 3 these adapters LBH-1. So the throwaway is not good to terrestrial environment, (it is the を which is the を).
　So, as for this battery problem, you think that ヵ⑦еヱЬЫЖロфwith it is more serious. At today when small size light weight conversion advances, many types have used that type private lithium ion battery. Looking each manufacturer, it turned, but the lithium ion battery of 2 - 9 types existed respectively. OlympusRelatively uniformly with LI-12B, but Already, the catalog it did to fall, because the μ miniD series is that private LI30B, perhaps the one to which also the inside buys the extra battery quickly is better.
　One more, it is the waterproof camera μ 720sw which becomes matter of concern, but that battery is LI-42B, but why probably there is no LI-12B. Coming to here, being non- standardization why? As for the same as μ 710 adjusting to the image pickup element? In any case it is completely kind with you cannot call to the user.
　Now ヵ⑦еヱЬЫЖロф2nd 3rd it has become natural. As small size light weight conversion pause been attached, it puts out, is standardization inside the manufacturer of course probably something which does not become the standardized standard product which crossed the manufacturer?

E-1的細道這裡有篇．．．
http://www.geocities.jp/ao_beko/doc/dejicame
06. 1/31這篇第一句話有個日期...是指2/26會發表嘛?

希望panasonic快一点推出4/3相机.leica出4/3镜头(管他AF还是MF).我们用户就有选择啦.

應該很貴吧

引文:

這是真的嗎

我覺得手動的也沒啥不好
那間接表示原廠的裂像對焦屏就有可能出現了

看到Carl Zeiss for F mount就想會不會也有Leica for 4/3...
不知道會不會也是MF鏡啊....我個人是不希望啦..