德國 Color Foto雜誌2007 5月號的測試

Digital test to the Olympus E-400

用E-400測試19隻 Olympus及Sigma的4/3鏡頭，雖可付費下載但想到徳文還是看網路上的討論省些錢

Colot Foto 相關link (用altavista線上翻譯)

http://world.altavista.com/babelfish/trurl_pagecontent?lp=de_en&trurl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.colorfoto.de%2fobjektive%2ftestberichte%2fdigitaltest_an_der_olympus_e_400.150737.htm

L-camera 討論
http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/digital-forum/22040-four-thirds-lens-review-german-colorfoto.html

其中穫得推薦有11隻鏡頭，ZD 150mm f2 92分最高，幾隻銀環上榜也不意外，Macro鏡也再次展現實力，到是 ZD 14-42mm 與 Sigma 18-50mm 以實用及小巧低價的到高分，只是同時擁有這兩隻鏡頭的用戶應該不多吧?

Olympus Zuiko Digital 2/150
92 - recommended

Olympus Zuiko Digital 4/7-14
87 - recommended

Olympus Zuiko Digital 2/35-100
87 - recommended

Sigma EX 2.8/105
87 - recommended

Olympus Zuiko Digital 3.5/35 Macro
86.5 of 150 points - recommended

Olympus Zuiko Digital 2.8/300
86 - recommended

Olympus Zuiko Digital 2/50 Macro
85.5 - recommended

Olympus Zuiko Digital 3.5-5.6/14-42
85.5 - recommended

Sigma EX 2.8/18-50 Macro
85.5 - recommended

Olympus Zuiko Digital 2.8/90-250
83 - recommended

Sigma EX 2.8/150 Macro
82.5 - recommended

4/3感覺顆顆是好鏡
錢砸下去都不會後悔

不過
好像沒看到自家50-200 還有SIGMA 24/1.8和 30/1.4這3隻哩...

Olympus Zuiko Digital 2.8-3.5/11-22
85
"A less extreme wide angle zoom. At 11 mm, sharpness is limited to the center. Stopping down will not do a lot towards improving the edges. Quite good from center focal length upwards. Price is fair considering the 11-22 focal length range; on account of the problems at 11 mm, still no recommendation."

Olympus Zuiko Digital 2.8-3.5/50-200
83
"Tele zoom with reasonable speed and good performance up to medium lengths, even better when stopped down. At 200mm, contrast will break down pretty strongly, leading to a weak 73 points score at that length. Hence, no recommendation."

Olympus Zuiko Digital 3.5-4.5/40-150
83
"This economically priced tele zoom works well at the short end, but performance decreases significantly towards the tele end. At 150mm, contrast and resolution are visibly worse which precludes a recommendation. Stopping down drastically will improve performance, but using f/9 at 150mm makes precious little sense

Olympus Zuiko Digital 2.8-3.5/14-54
84.5
"The faster version of the standard zoom lens. In the tele range, good performance requires stopping down, thus partially obliterating the theoretical advantages. At 54 mm it reaches a mediocre 80.5 score - not recommended."

Sigma EX 2.8/150 Macro
82.5 - recommended
"In direct comparison with the Oly 150, the Sigma is one stop slower and falls nearly 10 points short of the Oly's record score. While the Oly's performance is nearly independent of f stop, stoppind down the Sigma will improve contrast quite notably. Of course, price should be factored into the comparison: the Sigma will set you back only one quarter!"


Sigma 4-5.6/55-200
81.5
"The Sigma lens is the cheapest lens in today's roster. Also, it is the only lens that has visible lens centering problems. A second copy exhibited even worse centering problems, hinting towards a general problem in manufacturing. On the other hand, 150 euros is a super bargain price. Apart from the off-center lens problems, performance is satisfactory."

Sigma EX 1.4/30
69.5 of 150 points
"The Sigma lens is intended as a normal lens for APS sized sensors, and has shown to work quite well in that realm. For the smaller 4/3 sensor, results are less encouraging. Contrast wide open is moderate at best, with a notable decrease towards the corners. Stopping down improves the overall impression notably, and still makes a rather fast lens at 2.8".

Sigma EX 2.8/105
87 - recommended
"Actually a 24x36 lens, this lens is very sharp over the full area of the smaller 4/3 sensor (as can be expected). Stopping down will further increase sharpness. This helps both in scoring and in getting a clear recommendation

蠻令人吃驚的

熱門鏡 好像都不推薦

冷門鏡 好像有點出頭的感覺 哈哈哈

18-50 我來了.....

Leica D Lens 呢？
目前市面上有兩顆...
難道被遺忘了嗎？

ZD50200因為200mm端對比驟降被大扣分掉出recommended

不過單看分數的話卻又挺接近的,
我想作測試嘛....沒辦法每支超過80分就推薦,
只好找些理由篩掉一些鏡頭....
弄到最後上榜的不是銀環鏡就是微距鏡

Sigma EX 2.8/105
分數比
Sigma EX 2.8/150 Macro
還高分咧，差異是在哪？

西平英生2005-07鏡頭評鑑
Sigma EX 2.8/150 Macro---★★★★★



Sigma EX 1.4/30是真的不好

唉

引文:
在另一篇九月號的評比中，50-200 又被列為前五名的變焦鏡......
看來這些媒體的話真是要斟酌參考......

參考就好,別太認真~
該評比可能只衡量到畫質 和畫面反差對比,至於色澤和焦段的使用方便性沒有佔很大的比重.
像是14-54mm + 50-200mm不知道多少E-1的寫真專家拿來拍出多少好作品.(好照片產量蔗各組合應該是最高的).
當然要做出十全十美的評比也很難,
你只要抓出每份評比的公平性和主要評比著墨的衡量點是哪些?而這些重點是不是你在意的就好.

引文:

這是因為只比較望遠變焦鏡時，評比對像不同的結果，可惜無法找到相關望遠變焦鏡測試的評論 (雖然沒有在19隻4/3鏡評測中被推薦，50-200的分數仍是相當高的)