photorumors.com
Worst camera of the year (2013)
http://photorumors.com/2013/12/18/worst-camera-of-the-year-2013/

2013年最爛相機票選：

Leica X Vario ($2,850): a "mini M" was this not.

Hasselblad Stellar (unknown price): because the Lunar was not bad enough?

Pentax Q7 ($496.95): who is buying those?

Canon PowerShot N ($255): a camera with Facebook integration, would be great if we did not have smartphones.

Fujifilm X-A1 ($499): the X line is great, but don't we have enough models already?

Nikon 1 S1 ($279+): I think this was a joke.

Olympus Stylus 1 ($699): the OM-D is a great camera, but why make a mini-OM-D and sell it for $700?

Panasonic Lumix FZ70 ($279): with 20-1200mm lens - the only reason this camera exists is to show that 60x zoom compact is possible.

Samsung Galaxy Camera ($1,699): is it a camera or a tablet?

Sony Cybershot QX100 ($498): a self contain lens-camera module - a solution to a non-existing problem.

------------------------------------------------------------
這網站大概跟小站一樣，不需靠廣告維持

各位心目中2013最爛相機是那幾台

小弟選
Sony Cybershot QX100
理由是不解做這個鏡頭模組和做一台相機有什麼不同

------------------------------

Olympus Stylus 1 ($699): the OM-D is a great camera, but why make a mini-OM-D and sell it for $700?

------------------------------

呃............

小弟覺得這台真的很不錯說....

引文:
大概是價錢吧
上榜的產品 如果不是把相機當手機或平板做 就是CP值太低
可樂標跟哈~輸都上去了
這兩台如果買正常的價錢 跟SONY PANA本身的產品並沒有不同

其實說是覺得 爛不爛很主觀
小弟覺得很多長焦DC 甚麼60倍變焦 根本該拿去填海
1/2.3吋CMOS 加上高倍變焦 畫質爛到極點
打鳥從來都不是便宜的

stylus 1 我也覺得不錯
如果水貨能賣到一萬八 那我會買
兩萬多確實是有點貴
http://shopping.pchome.com.tw/?mod=item&func=exhibit&IT_NO=DGBQ1N-A70406793&SR_NO=DGBQ2B&ROWNO=2
apsc現在賣不到一萬....

不過 如果stylus 1 能叫爛
canon G series在g12以後 就應該停產了

發現「十大惡人」排行榜比這個更精彩且有意義

引文:

而且好笑的是，真的"惡人先告狀" .....哈哈哈