°Q½×°Ï¥D¶ » Canon SLR » EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? | µLµoªíÅv |
¾ðª¬Åã¥Ü | ·sªº¦b«e | «e¤@Ó¥DÃD | ¤U¤@Ó¥DÃD | ¶§À |
µoªíªÌ | °Q½×¤º®e |
---|---|
¤s¤ô | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-07-06 13:47 |
Not too shy to talk µù¥U¤é: 2005-04-15 ¨Ó¦Û: µoªí¼Æ: 35
|
[14967]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? ¥xÆWªº¶Ç»D¬O1800¸Uµe¯À
¦b°ê¥~¬Ý¨Ó³£¬O2200¸Uµe¯À¥H¤W ¨ì©³þÃä¤~¤ñ¸û¥¿½T©O |
ITO | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-07-06 22:00 |
ºô¯¸ºÞ²zû µù¥U¤é: 2004-09-15 ¨Ó¦Û: ¤é¥» µoªí¼Æ: 30762
|
[14975]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? ¤Þ¤å:
Ó¤H¬O»{¬°2200¸Uµe¯À¥H¤Wªº¸Ü¡A¹ïÃèÀY·|¬O«ÜÄY¼Fªº¦ÒÅç |
92165492 | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-07-10 21:17 |
Quite a regular µù¥U¤é: 2005-08-22 ¨Ó¦Û: H.K. µoªí¼Æ: 74
|
[15071]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? Ãø¹D³Ì±M¶QªºLÃè¤]·|³Q2200ªº¸Uµe¯À¦Ò°_¶Ü
|
¤s¤ô | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-07-10 23:34 |
Not too shy to talk µù¥U¤é: 2005-04-15 ¨Ó¦Û: µoªí¼Æ: 35
|
[15078]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? LÃè¤]¤£¬O¯«Ãè
2200¸Uµe¯À©Ò»ÝnªºÃèÀY ¸Ñ¹³±ø¼Æ¥i¯àn300±ø¥H¤W¤~²Å¦X»Ý¨D |
Lulumiwang | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-07-17 17:30 |
Not too shy to talk µù¥U¤é: 2006-05-01 ¨Ó¦Û: ¥xÆW µoªí¼Æ: 14
|
[15238]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? §ÚÅ¥¨ìCanon¤º³¡¸û½T©wªº®ø®§¬O
¤µ¦~¤£·|µoªí5D¨t¦C¥H¤Wªº·s¾÷ 1D¨t¦C·|©ú¦~¤~¥X ¨Ñ¤j®a°Ñ¦Ò |
tjchung | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-07-17 21:34 |
Not too shy to talk µù¥U¤é: 2005-04-19 ¨Ó¦Û: ¥x«n¥« µoªí¼Æ: 12
|
[15241]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? ©Ò¥H¤µ¦~¬î©u¥i¯à¥Xªº·s¾÷¬O370D?
|
hhocean | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-07-17 22:26 |
Not too shy to talk µù¥U¤é: 2006-07-07 ¨Ó¦Û: µoªí¼Æ: 43
|
[15243]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? ÃèÀY¸òµe¯À¦³Ãö«Y?
¨º¬O¤£¬O»¡¦³¥i¯à²{¦b¶RªºÃèÀY¥H«á°ªµe¯À«á¥i¯à¤£¾A¥Î¡H |
dvkw | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-07-18 00:22 |
Quite a regular µù¥U¤é: 2005-01-18 ¨Ó¦Û: µoªí¼Æ: 123
|
[15246]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? ¤Þ¤å:
¤µ¦~¥i¥H¥ýµoªí°Ú ©ú¦~¤~¥X |
Lulumiwang | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-07-18 08:37 |
Not too shy to talk µù¥U¤é: 2006-05-01 ¨Ó¦Û: ¥xÆW µoªí¼Æ: 14
|
[15261]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? Canon¤º³¡®ø®§¬O
5D¥H¤U·|¥X·s¾÷ ¤º³¡¨M©w¤µ¦~¤£¥ýµoªí1¨t®ø®§(Äá¼v¤j®i) 1D¨t¦Cµ¥©ú¦~²Ä¤@©uª½±µµoªí¤W¥« |
eva9118 | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-09-09 10:22 |
Just popping in µù¥U¤é: 2006-09-09 ¨Ó¦Û: µoªí¼Æ: 1
|
[17081]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? ¤Þ¤å:
¨º¦³Å¥¨ì·|¬O¦h¤Öq»ù©O¡H¬O¶Ç¨¥ªº5000¬üª÷¶Ü¡H |
KEITH | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-09-10 22:50 |
Not too shy to talk µù¥U¤é: 2005-11-22 ¨Ó¦Û: µoªí¼Æ: 48
|
[17121]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? «Ü¤[¨S¦³·sÁÁ¨¥¤F..
Source September 10th If someone who speaks better German than me (not difficult) wants to check out this thread on www.dslr-forum.de there are some interesting comments regarding a 3D already being shown to the main dealers? - any details or clarification appreciated. Over on DPR there is a post suggesting that the 1DsIII (or even IIn?) was going to be released, but without sensor cleaning - didn't go down too well with some so, it's got delayed until PMA to appear with sensor cleaning. "The new camera will be announced when it is ready to go into production. Canon is hoping that it will be by the time PMA rolls around or sooner if things go smoothly. They still have to finalize the design and then retool the molds and dies. I've been told that Canon has made the 1Ds redesign the # 1 priority in the DSLR division." Well ... make of that one what you will... |
ITO | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-09-10 23:09 |
ºô¯¸ºÞ²zû µù¥U¤é: 2004-09-15 ¨Ó¦Û: ¤é¥» µoªí¼Æ: 30762
|
[17122]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? ³oùؤ]¦³¤@Ó
dpreview.com forums¶Ç»D http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=19951138 ·s«¬1Ds¦b©ú¦~3¤ëªºPMAµn³õ¡H ¦Û¦b°Ò«¢¹yªº±M·~¹ï¶H¸g¾P°ÓÅ¥¨ìªº¶Ç»D¡A Canonªº·s«¬1Ds¡A ¸Ë¸ü·P¥ú¤¸¥ó¦Û°Ê°£¹Ð¸Ë¸m¡A©ó©ú¦~3¤ëªºPMA¤§«eµoªí¡C |
cocoen | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-09-10 23:30 |
Just popping in µù¥U¤é: 2006-07-06 ¨Ó¦Û: µoªí¼Æ: 1
|
[17123]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? ª©¥D¤j¤j¡G¥i¥H½¤@¤U¶Ü¡H¤p§Ìªº^¤å«ÜÄê¡K¬Ý¤£¤ÓÀ´C~
¤Þ¤å:
|
KEITH | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-09-10 23:54 |
Not too shy to talk µù¥U¤é: 2005-11-22 ¨Ó¦Û: µoªí¼Æ: 48
|
[17125]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? ITO¥Sªº¸ò§Úpoªº¤]¬O¬Û¦Pªºthread.
³o¬q¤j·N¬O¦bwww.dslr-forum.de³oÓ¼w°ê½×¾Â¤W¦³¤@¨ÇÃö©óEOS 3D¤w¸g®i¥Üµ¹¸g¾P°Óªº¦³½ìµû½×¡A¦bDpreview¤W«h´£¨ì1Ds MK3¦]¬°n·f¸üºî¦X¦¡·P¥ú¤¸¥ó²M¼ä¤¸¥ó¡AÀ³¸Ó·|©µ¿ð¨ì2007¤G¤ëªºPMA¤¤µoªí¡C ·sªº¬Û¾÷±N·|¦b·Ç³Æ¦n¤§®Éµoªí¡A¦pªG¤@¤Á¶¶§Qªº¸Ü¡ACanon¤]§Æ±æ¯à°÷¦bPMA©Î¤§«e´N¯àµoªí·s¾÷ºØ¡CCanon¤´¦b¶i¦æ³Ì«áªº¶¥¬q¡Cµo¤åªÌ¨Ãªí¥Ü³Q§iª¾Canon·|§â·sªº1¨t¦Cµø¬°·í«e³Ì«nªº¤u§@¡C |
Lulumiwang | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-09-11 17:52 |
Not too shy to talk µù¥U¤é: 2006-05-01 ¨Ó¦Û: ¥xÆW µoªí¼Æ: 14
|
[17138]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? ¤Þ¤å:
©w»ùÀ³¸Ó©M´ڮt¤£¦h °£«D³Ìªñ¦³§Oªº¼t®an¥X¥þ´T ¨ºÓ5000¬üª÷ªº©w»ù¬O©ñ¥X¨Ó®£À~¹ï¤â Y¦³Ävª§±N·|¥H¦¹»ùÄv»ù |
KEITH | µoªí®É¶¡: 2006-09-22 16:23 |
Not too shy to talk µù¥U¤é: 2005-11-22 ¨Ó¦Û: µoªí¼Æ: 48
|
[17729]
Re: EOS-1Ds Mark II N ¶Ç»D?? ¨u¨£ªº¤@¤j½g§ó·s
Source 21st Interesting post on FM about the benefits of DiGiC 3 as it would appear in a new top range camera (thanks for the link Geoff) Support for faster write speeds to new generation CF cards allowing larger images at high FPS rates. This includes the potential for (?) continuous write for JPEGS up to a certain size. ¡¥Much more sophisticated and faster AF tracking and processing¡¦, especially balancing between multiple AF points and tracking moving objects. More advanced noise reduction algorithms, allowing higher ISO to be used and providing smoother medium ISO images. More accurate exposure processing for better dynamic range preservation. Better image processing for generating JPEGs that are usable straight out of the camera and have higher dynamic range / preservation of detail in bright and dark areas. There was also some comment about the 1Ds development program, and why Canon would definitely want it out of the door sooner rather than later They (Canon) had been working on two different professional cameras for a while, but would probably only release one for now Several generations of prototypes of both cameras had been in use for some time by selected pro-photographers. The new EOS 1 series had recently had a design upgrade which was delaying its availability. Canon was keen to release it as soon as possible as it it would be a flagship camera that was ¡¥untouchable¡¦ in the market. I've been busy (20th - cursed paying work!) and missed the flourish of comments about finding a reference to an entirely new EOS 1 series camera in a DLL file in the latest version of DPP/ZoomBrowser shipped with the XTi/400D. Looking inside the files we find in deImgT72.dll (ZoomBrowser) - GNU 'strings -a' output: Canon EOS-1DX EOS D6000C EOS D2000C Canon EOS-1DS Canon EOS-1D Canon EOS D60 Canon EOS D30 It seems that previous versions did not contain the 1Dx reference, although there is a suggestion that the 1Dx might be a reference to the 1D2 and that there is actually nothing new here... ...anyway, plenty of info (not on the FM PK rumour thread The birth of a brand snippet from yesterday has managed to work itself up to Canon's answer to the Leica M8 - a new EVF based rangefinder camera. ¨ä¤¤¦³ÃöDIGIC III¸ò1Ds¨t¦Cªº¤º¤å½Ķ¦p¤U: DIGIC III: 1.´£¨Ñ·s¤@¥NCF¥d§ó§Öªº¼g¤J³t«×¡AÅýµe½è³]©w¦¨¤j¼v¹³Àɮפ]¯à¦³°ª³t³s©ç¯à¤O¡A¤]¥]¬A¦³JPG³s©ç¨ì¥dº¡ªº¼ç¤O 2.§óºë±K¥B§Ö³tªºAF¯à¤O¡A¯S§O¬O¨Ï¥Î¦hÂI¹ïµJ¨Ó°lµJ©çÄá 3.§ó¦nªºÂø°T§í¨îªí²{¡AÅý°ªISO¦¨¬°¥i¥ÎISO¡AÅý¤¤µ¥ISOȪº¼v¹³§ó¥¶¶ 4.§óºë½TªºÃn¥ú¹Bºâ¡A¥B¯à«O¯d§ó¤jªº«G·t³¡°ÊºA½d³ò 5.¹ï©óJPG¼v¹³³B²z¡A¦³§ó¨Îªºµe½è¡B¸û°ªªº°ÊºA½d³ò¯à«O¯d§ó¦h«G·t³¡ªº²Ó¸` 1Ds series: 1.Canon¤w¸g¬°¤F¨â´Ú±M·~¾÷ºØ§V¤O¤@°}¤l¤F¡A¦ýÀ³¸Ó·|¦bªñ´Á¥u¥ýµoªí´Á¤¤ªº¤@´Ú 2.¤w¸g¿ï©w¤F¤@¨Ç¾·~Äá¼v®v¹ï³o¨Ç·s¾÷ºØ¶i¦æ¤@¬q®É¶¡ªº´ú¸Õ 3.·sªºEOS 1¨t¦C¦]¬°¦³³]p¤Wªº§ó·s¡A¦]¦Ó©µ¿ð¤F |
« 1 (2) |
¾ðª¬Åã¥Ü | ·sªº¦b«e | «e¤@Ó¥DÃD | ¤U¤@Ó¥DÃD | ¶º |
µLµoªíÅv | |